A cross-party group of peers is to re-launch an attempt to revive a "snoopers' charter" in the government's draft counter-terrorism bill.
Lords King, Blair, Carlile and West want measures rejected by the Lib Dems in 2012 to be included in the bill, saying it is vital to combat terrorism.
The move did not receive enough support last week but the peers hope to push through the proposals on Monday.
The counter-terrorism bill will give new powers to UK security services.
It will also allow the home secretary to impose temporary exclusion orders on British terror suspects.
The legislation has already cleared its first hurdle in the House of Lords, and undergone detailed scrutiny in committee.
Peers will now embark on the first of two days' report-stage scrutiny, during which amendments will be proposed and changes made to the bill in committee considered.
Security gap?
Lat week, former Conservative Defence Secretary Lord King, ex-Metropolitan Police commissioner Lord Blair, former Lib Dem independent reviewer of anti-terror laws Lord Carlile and former Labour security minister Lord West proposed adding whole sections of the defeated Communications Data Bill to the counter-terrorism legislation.
The proposed amendments sought to require internet service providers to log more of what people do online and to make that data more easily accessible to law enforcement and security services.
But they scaled back the number of agencies that could demand access to the data from the hundreds included in the original bill to just three: the police and the two security services.
Opponents of the so-called snoopers' charter say it would amount to mass surveillance of internet communications by the state.
But making the case for the reintroduction of the rejected draft legislation, the peers argued that there was a dangerous gap in Britain's ability to deal with the threats posed by terrorists and serious criminals.
However, there was not enough support for the move in the House of Lords and their proposals were withdrawn.
Judicial oversight
They pledged to press ahead with the bid again unless the Home Office published a government redraft of the Communications Data Bill - resulting in the amendments being re-tabled for debate on Monday.
Peers will also consider amendments to the bill's proposed travel restriction and passport confiscation powers, during the debate.
The Counter Terrorism Bill also includes a requirement on universities and councils to take steps to counter radicalisation.
It also includes:
Under the exclusion orders proposal, Home Secretary Theresa May would be able to sign an order to ban a suspected extremist from returning to the UK, for up to two years at a time.
The individual could return if they agreed to some kind of investigation or monitoring arrangements to ensure they were not a threat.
Labour has called for a judge to have a role when the orders are imposed, a view echoed by David Anderson QC, the government's independent reviewer of terror legislation.
No comments:
Post a Comment